Skip to Main Content
undefined

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)

Lesson Components

Equal Protection and Affirmative Action Essay – Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)Regents of the University of California v. Bakke – Case BackgroundDocuments to Examine (A-M) – Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)The Issue Endures – Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)

Appraise the claim that the University of California at Davis special admissions program resulted in unconstitutional reverse discrimination.

Documents you will examine:

  1. Section of the Fourteenth Amendment, 1868
  2. Executive Order 10925, 1961
  3. “Civil Rights Legislation,” 1963
  4. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
  5. President Lyndon Johnson, Speech at Howard University, 1965
  6. Program Demographics, 1970-1974
  7. Education by Race Statistics, 1940-1980
  8. Alan Bakke’s Credentials, 1973-1974
  9. UC-Davis’s Reply to Bakke’s Query on Age, 1972
  10. Oral Arguments, 1978
  11. Justice Thurgood Marshall’s Memo, 1978
  12. Plurality Decision (5-4), Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 1978
  13. Justice Marshall’s Separate Opinion, Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 1978

Read the Case Background and Key Question. Then analyze Documents A-M. Finally, answer the Key Question in a well-organized essay that incorporates your interpretations of Documents A-M, as well as your own knowledge of history.

The phrase “affirmative action” first appeared in a 1961 executive order by President John F. Kennedy, barring federal contractors from discriminating on the basis of race, creed, color, or national origin. President Lyndon B. Johnson echoed this phrasing in his own policies and speeches. Congress later passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, barring discrimination by any institutions receiving federal money.

The University of California at Davis Medical School, a public school, was founded in 1966. The first class of fifty students was made up of forty-seven white students and three of Asian descent. In order to achieve a more racially diverse student body, in 1970 the University took what it described as affirmative action by creating two separate admissions programs. The general program required a 2.5 GPA, an interview, letters of recommendation, and test scores. The special program, for which only disadvantaged members of minority groups were eligible, had no GPA cutoff.

By 1973, the class size had doubled to 100, and of those 100 spaces, sixteen were reserved for minority applicants in the special program. Applicants to the special program competed only against each other for admission, and did not compete against applicants to the general admissions program.

Allan Bakke, a Caucasian, applied twice to the medical school, and was rejected both times. His GPA and test scores, however, were higher than those of any of the students accepted into the special program. He sued the school, charging that the special admissions program amounted to a quota system that discriminated against whites.

Is affirmative action a violation of equality? This Homework Help video on the case of University of California Regents v. Bakke asks students to consider this question.

Student Handouts

Equal Protection and Affirmative Action Essay – Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke – Case Background

Documents to Examine (A-M) – Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)

The Issue Endures – Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)

Related Resources

Video

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke | BRI’s Homework Help Series

4 Min

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke was a case brought to the Supreme Court over the use of Affirmative Action in the college admission process. The University of California at Davis Medical School created a minimum minority student quota for the admissions department to fill each year. Bakke, a two-time UC-Davis Med School rejected applicant, sued the school for violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Acts. Ultimately, the Supreme Court justices ruled in support of the goals of Affirmative Action because of incorporation, the idea that the states must adhere to the protections of the Bill of Rights. They also stated that Bakke was, in fact, denied equal protection. This decision, because it was so muddled, did not set long-term precedents or clarifications concerning Affirmative Action. What is Affirmative Action? Affirmative Action is a policy, usually carried out by schools, businesses, government entities, and federal contractors, in which individuals of minority racial status are afforded preferential treatment on the basis of race. Affirmative action came about as part of a desire to rectify the traditional underrepresentation of minority peoples in desirable professions and universities, which negatively impacted their financial and social conditions.

E Lesson

Affirmative Action

20 Min

When is Affirmative Action Justified? Affirmative Action is a policy, usually carried out by schools, businesses, government entities, and federal contractors, in which individuals of minority racial status are afforded preferential treatment on the basis of race. Affirmative action came about as part of a desire to rectify the traditional underrepresentation of minority peoples in desirable professions and universities, which negatively impacted their financial and social conditions.